Immigration Control
(IC)
Manual-
Chapter
1-
Security Screening
Process Mallual
Protected B
significant influence on the exercise
of
government policy or
is
or
was able to benefit from their
position,
and
includes:
(a)
heads
of
state or government;
(b)
members
of
the cabinet or governing council;
(c)
senior advisors
to
persons described
in
paragraph
(a)
or
(b);
(d)
senior members
of
the public service;
(e)
senior members
of
the military and
of
the intelligence and internal security services;
(f)
ambassadors
and
senior diplomatic officials; and
(g)
members
of
the judiciary.
ENF 18, section 8.2 breaks down into three (3) categories persons who are inadmissible under
section 35 (I )(b)
of
IRP A and lists the evidentiary requirements to establish inadmissibility for each
category.
Category I:
Named positions described
in
R16(a), R16(b), R16(f) ambassadors only, and RI6(g);
That a person
is
or
was
an
official in this category
is
determinative
of
the allegation.
Aside from the designation and proof that the person holds
or
held such a position, no
further evidence is required to establish inadmissibility.
Category II:
Senior positions described
in
RI6(c), R16(d), R16(e), and RI6(f) senior diplomatic
officials
In addition to the designation
of
the regime, the officer must established that the position
the individual holds
or
held
is
indeed a senior one and should be related to the hierarchy
in which the function operates. A general indicator
is
that an individual's position
is
positioned within the top half
of
the hierarchy
of
an
organization.
Category III:
Persons not described in R16;
In addition to the designation
of
the regime, the officer must establish that the individual
exercised significant influence on the action
or
policies
of
the regime
or
benefitted from
the position.
The following questions may assist officers
in
determining
if
a position
is
described
in
R16(c):
senior advisors
to
heads
of
state
or
government and
or
members
of
the cabinet
or
governing
council; orR16 (d): senior members
ofthe
public service.
6l
269A
-
R@iggg@d
dlid@i
lii@AEEgggto::iiBiiiIdllBiiAd
ASFC
-
Divulgation
en
vertu
de
la
loi
sur
l'Acces
a
I'information
Immigration
Control
(IC)
Manual-
Chapter
1-
Security Screening
Process
Manual
Protected B
Appendix F - Who to contact
at
HQ
Issue
Who to contact
Email Address
For assistance
in
the context
NSSD
of
security screening, officers
should contact the NSSD
General assistance for
For section 34, 35 and 37 cases that do
section 34,
35
and
37
cases.
not fall within the purview
of
the
NSSD (i.e. no screening request has or
will be sent), officers may contact the
Intelligence Operations and Analysis
Division (lOAD) at the CBSA for
general assistance
in
researching
and/or obtaining additional
information.
Contentious, sensitive
or
IRCC
-
Case
Management
Branch
high profile cases
manages contentious, sensitive and
j
high profile cases on behalf
of
the
Minister
of
Citizenship and
Immigration. Case Management
should be contacted and kept informed
when officers become involved
in
such cases.
The NSSD should also be made aware
of
files when inadmissibility under
sections 34, 35 and/or 37
ofIRP
A is
involved.
CSIS
should be made aware
of
cases
involving national security issues
related
to
section 34 ofIRPA.
General screening
IRCC-
Security, Admissibility and
procedures
Screening Unit, Program Integrity
Branch at IRCC HQ may be contacted
by CPC-V or any overseas visa office:
for guidance on overall
screening procedures;
for assistance or guidance on
questions
or
issues related to
security screening.
Temporary
Resident
Case Management Branch at IRCC
Permits
(TRP)
or
PPTRV
should be made aware
of
files
involving TRPs and PPTRVs.
68
ASFC-
I
Created with BuildVu
GcmsNotes.com